
'Green Community'
Designer(s):
Team1: Leda Demetriadou, Britt Segeren, Caden Swe
Team2: Leda Demetriadou (individual design)
Professor(s):
Daryl Mulvihill, Daan Lammers
Year:
2025
The proposal envisions a future for living in Eindhoven where diverse people, functions and landscapes coexist, and nature blends seamlessly with the community. Responding to the increasing departure of internationals and the goals of Eindhoven’s 2030 strategy, it addresses the need for innovation hubs, housing and connection. The layout consists of two main strips: residential at the edge, blending with the surroundings, and a retail strip in the middle, with makerspaces in between, where products are made and sold.
A variety of modular typologies: residential slabs with shared functions, mixed-use towers, and row houses, attract different users to live, work, relax and connect. Shared courtyards host communal functions like parks, fields or greenhouses, offering both private and public spaces for informal interaction. Residents are placed based on needs and lifestyle: elderly in quieter shared buildings, families closer to activity, supporting peer interaction and spontaneous encounters.
The proposal brings people closer to both nature and community, integrating greenery through courtyards, terraces and a central green strip reconnecting the site to its natural context. It follows the “15-minute city” vision, where daily needs are within walking distance. While this may limit larger gatherings, the proposal promotes well-being and sustainable everyday life.
Studio:
Urban Housing
Booklet
Contribution to Development
This project was an incredible opportunity to rethink urban housing in a Dutch neighbourhood, integrating both user needs and the municipality's strategies for a more connected, sustainable future. In this course, I had the opportunity to delve into strategic design in the Netherlands, combining the user-centered mindset I am developing in Industrial Design with my background in Architecture. I approached the project on multiple levels, community and individual, considering users’ privacy, needs and expectations through interviews and contextual research. This was also a valuable moment for me to re-experience architecture in a new setting, in an individual level rather than in teams that I was used to, with a different working culture. Here, the focus was more on feasibility, aligning with the city’s strategic plans, listening to users, and following a more structured, iterative design pace.









